गौतमोऽपि महातेजा अहल्यासहितस्सुखी। रामं सम्पूज्य विधिवत्तपस्तेपे महातपा:।।1.49.21।।
Meaning
Gautama too, greatly splendid, now happy together with Ahalya, having duly honored Rama, resumed his great austerity.
Word-by-word (pada-artha)
| Word | Devanagari | Meaning | Grammatical role |
|---|---|---|---|
| gautamaḥ api mahā-tejā | गौतमः अपि महा-तेजा | Gautama too, of great energy | Nominative / Adverbial / Nominative |
| ahalyā-sahitaḥ sukhī | अहल्या-सहितः सुखी | together with Ahalya, happy | Nominative singular (x2) |
| rāmam sampūjya vidhi-vat | रामम् सम्पूज्य विधि-वत् | having duly honored Rama | Accusative / Gerund / Adverbial |
| tapaḥ tepe mahā-tapāḥ | तपः तेपे महा-तपाः | performed austerity, of great asceticism | Accusative / Verb (perfect) / Nominative |
Scholar commentary
valmikiramayan.net Prose Commentary
Desiraju Hanumanta Rao's prose rendering with embedded explanatory notes
The source appends a substantial endnote surveying competing interpretations of who or what Ahalya represents. Materialist readers take her name as 'a + halya,' unploughed land, with Rama's episode symbolizing agricultural reform (paralleling a similar reading of Rama's elimination of the 'saline demon' as treating seawater to make it potable). The popular legend of Ahalya turning to stone and being restored by Rama's foot-touch is not present in Valmiki's own text; it derives from the Padma Purana (saa tataH tasya raamasya paada sparshanaat...). The Uttara Kanda offers a separate legend for why Indra is called 'sahasra aksha' (thousand-eyed): Gautama's curse was originally for a thousand vaginal apertures to appear on Indra's body, later amended, at Indra's plea, to a thousand eye-like apertures instead. F. Max Muller, in his History of Sanskrit Literature, cites the ancient commentator Kumarila Bhatt's reading of the whole episode as solar allegory: Indra represents the sun and Ahalya the night ('ahaH' day, 'lil' night), with the sun 'seducing' and dispelling the night each morning. Finally, Dharmakutam reads the episode through the lens of social reintegration after a moral fault ('paatityam'), citing Gautama's own reasoning that repeated wrongdoing, not a single lapse, is what constitutes true downfall -- so amends and eventual acceptance back into the fold remain possible.
1 of 16 traditions have commentary on this shloka. Traditions without a verse-specific commentary here are omitted rather than filled in.
Reference: 1.49.22 · Bāla Kāṇḍa